14th Wessex Theory Seminar
The fourteenth meeting of the Wessex Theory Seminar was held at the University of Bath on Wednesday 23rd May 2012.
Travel & Venue
University of Bath travel information: http://www.bath.ac.uk/about/gettinghere/ .
All lectures will take place in room 2.1 in the 3 East building (3E 2.1). Maps can be found here: http://www.bath.ac.uk/maps/ .
From the train station you will have to get a bus or a taxi to campus. If you take the bus then ride it to the last stop on campus, the bus stand, and if you take a taxi do the same. There will (hopefully) be signs from there guiding you to the seminar.
Programme
10:30 Coffee
11:00 Olle Fredriksson, Birmingham. ( Website , Abstract , Slides )
11:45 Georg Struth, Sheffield. ( Website , Abstract )
12:30 Lunch
13:45 Alessio Guglielmi, Bath. ( Website , Abstract , Slides )
14:30 James Davenport, Bath. ( Website , Abstract , Slides )
15:15 Edmund Robinson, Queen Mary. ( Website , Abstract )
16:00 Coffee
16:30 Jim Laird, Bath. ( Website , Abstract )
17:15 Uday Reddy, Birmingham. ( Website , Abstract , Paper )
18:00 Pub/Dinner
Titles & Abstracts
Anchor  


James Davenport, Bath
Programming semantics in the presence of complex numbers, logarithms etc.
In considering the reliability of numerical programs, it is normal to "limit our study to the semantics dealing with numerical precision". On the other hand, there is a great deal of work on the reliability of programs that essentially ignores the numerics. The thesis of this paper is that there is a class of problems that fall between these two, which could be described as "does the lowlevel arithmetic implement the highlevel mathematics". Many of these problems arise because mathematics, particularly the mathematics of the complex numbers, is more difficult than expected: for example the complex function log is not continuous, and many algebraic simplification rules are not universally valid.
Anchor  


Olle Fredriksson, Birmingham
Towards seamless distributed computing
We present a seamless approach to writing and compiling distributed code. By "seamless" we mean that the syntax and semantics of the distributed program remain the same as if it was executed on one node only, except for label annotations indicating on what node subterms of the program are to be executed. There are no restrictions on how node labels are to be assigned to subterms. We show how the paradigmatic (higherorder functional recursive) programming language PCF , extended with node annotations, can be used for this purpose. The compilation technique is directly inspired by game semantics and the Geometry of Interaction.
Anchor  


Alessio Guglielmi, Bath
Towards More Efficient and Natural Proof Systems
I will illustrate an ongoing research programme aimed at improving the representation of formal proofs.
In recent years we discovered that cut elimination can be performed in a way that is largely independent of syntax, provided that we are able to compose proofs in more liberal ways than the classical proof theory of Gentzen permits. That same liberal composition mechanism, that we call deep inference, provides for analytic proofs that are smaller, and so more efficient, than what Gentzen theory gives us.
Now we intend to use deep inference and certain geometric intuitions to design a new logical formalism where proofs will be represented with a minimum of syntax. This way, proof representation will be less idiosyncratic and so more natural.
Anchor  


Jim Laird, Bath
Regular Language Game Semantics for Polymorphism with Dynamic Binding
I will present a fully abstract model for a blockstructured language with (finite) integer state, higherrank polymorphism (universal and existential types) and dynamically bound variables. Typing of functions is based on Reynolds' Syntactic Control of Interference (SCI), which constrains sharing of identifiers between procedures. I shall discuss two variants of the typing rule for dynamic binding, corresponding to "strong" and "weak" forms of interference control, and focus on the latter as it leads to a simpler, strongly sequential model, and can express (bounded) nesting of functions.
The categorical structures used to in the semantics are an instance of a more general notion of model for stateful languages based on dual input and output types and an associated trace operator: I shall also discuss connections with Reddy/McCusker's relational model of SCI. In our semantics, types denote finite fragments of a "universal event structure" , with a question/answer relation used to represent generic "copycat" behaviour. Programs of a given type denote regular languages over the corresponding set of events. The main result is that the model is sound and complete for program equivalence, which is therefore decidable.
Anchor  


Uday Reddy, Birmingham
Axiomatizing relational parametricity
Relational parametricity is a semantic reasoning principle proposed by John Reynolds, to capture the ideas of data abstraction and information hiding in programs. It is closely related to logical relations, widely used for proving properties of typed lambda calculi, and simulation and bisimulation relations used for proving the equivalence of data types and processes. It is also tantalizingly close to the idea of natural transformations that form the foundation for category, but generalizes them to higherorder types.
In this talk, I present a categorical axiomatisation of the concept, marrying the ideas of of reflexive graphs and fibrations. The axiomatisation has a wide ranging application for categories other than Set, including algebraic and other mathematical structures, domains, presheaves, as well as eventbased models. Applications of the axiomatic treatment for the semantics of polymorphic lambda calculus and the semantics of Algollike languages will be highlighted.
Despite all this progress, much work still remains to be done in various directions, in exploring connections with various branches of mathematics, computer science and physics. I hope to indicate what these directions might be.
Anchor  


Edmund Robinson, Queen Mary
Ultrametric spaces, trees and lazy datastructures
Ultrametric spaces are used as a modelling technology, but in fact are more closely connected to treelike structures than conventional metric spaces. The aim of this talk is to explain that relationship and the consequent link with lazy datatypes.
Anchor  


Georg Struth, Sheffield
Semigroups for Concurrency
Concurrent Kleene algebras have recently been proposed for studying various approaches to concurrency in a simple, abstract and uniform way. It turns out that semigroups, which account for the
interaction between sequential and concurrent composition, play a crucial role in this investigation.
This overviews concurrent Kleene algebras and discusses some of their most important models, including shuffle languages and seriesparallel pomsets. It then explains their relationship to concurrent separation logic and elaborates on the role and potential of semigroup theory for concurrency. Since the approach is quite novel, there are so far more questions than answers, some of which will be raised at the end of the presentation.
Attendance
Altran Praxis
Florian Schanda
Bath
Ana C. Calderon
Anupam Das
Alessio Guglielmi
Jim Laird
Guy McCusker
John Power
Cai Wingfield
David Wilson
James Davenport
Matthew England
Ali El Kaafarani
Mesar Hameed
Birmingham
Olle Fredriksson
Paul Levy
Uday Reddy
Chuangjie Xu
LiangTing Chen
Coastline Computer Consultancy
John Hanson
Imperial College London
Faris AbouSaleh
Queen Mary
Edmund Robinson
Paulo Oliva
Royal Holloway
Dusko Pavlovic
Sheffield
Georg Struth
Southampton
Owen Stephens
Swansea
Martin Churchill
Peter Mosses
Casper Bach Poulsen
Ferdinand Vesely
See all Wessex sites involved and meetings so far.